HOW THE PANDEMIC STOLE CINEMA – Or did it? The Digitalisation of Films in a Post-Pandemic Landscape (C21063987)

Source: An Empty Cinema by Tima Miroshnichenko on Pexels

Please take your seats and turn OFF your phones; the movie is about to begin. COVID-19 certainly changed the world as we know it: people were told to stay indoors, workplaces and non-essential establishments had to shut, and so the world stood still. Fast forwards to May 2021, after 3 national lockdowns, indoor venues were allowed to re-open, with the hopes to return to ‘normality’, however, one key cultural industry was left struggling to recover from the aftermath of the pandemic: cinemas. With subscribers of streaming platforms having drastically increased over the pandemic, not only has the demand for cinemas now been put into question, but also the need for film culture preservation.

This blog will highlight the long-lasting effects on the struggling industry, by discussing how the digitalisation of content for consumption on streaming platforms altered audience watching habits.

Source: Woman Applying Hand Sanitizer by Anna Shvets on Pexels

Screening or Streaming?

Over the pandemic, cinemas experienced great financial difficulties, as a result of having to close down their indoor venues to the public. One of the UK’s most successful chains, Cineworld, experienced a revenue loss of “more than 80% from $4.3bn pre-pandemic to $852m last year [(2020)]” stated the Guardian (2021). In early 2020, new releases like the 007 movie, No Time To Die (2021), was initially pushed back seven months, to discourage people from visiting the cinema and reduce the risk of spreading the virus. 

On the other hand, popular subscription services, The Guardian (2021) comments, “such as Netflix, Disney+ and Amazon Prime Video soared by 50% to 31m as locked-down Britons turned to the small screen”, due to more people required to stay indoors. Data from Business of Apps (2024) demonstrates how Netflix saw a 9.43% increase in subscribers between the fourth quarter of 2019 (167.09m) and the first quarter of 2020 (182.86m). The latest statistic from Netflix shows that in their fourth quarter of 2023, the number of subscribers reached 260.2m, thus highlighting the prevalence of streaming services, even after pandemic ended. 

Source: Person Holding a Remote Control by freestocks.org on Pexels

Times are Changing:

One must ask: what effect does this have on the film industry? Through film digitalisation, as suggested by Benyon et al. (2015), can be used to “[increase] numbers of audiences consume the arts through digital channels and devices… it also has significant impact on current practices for the production, distribution, and the creation of meaning for audiences”. In May 2021, new releases, like Cruella (2021), were made available in both theatres and on streaming-service giant, Disney+, though with an charge additional to the customers’ monthly subscriptions, to booster the income of re-opened cinemas, whilst also appealing to potential customers who still did not feel comfortable with being in crowded spaces. 

This emerging habit, however, explains how the digital consumption of films altered the modes of viewing, over the course of the pandemic, where people feel less inclined to visit a physical venue and now prefer home movie streaming. Research by Zhao (2024) demonstrates that 56% of participants surveyed have a reduced motivation to visit a movie theatre, since the emergence of COVID, and with more people being inclined to set-up a ‘home-cinema’ system – such as paying for streaming services – to get more from their money’s worth. Arguably, cinemas can be seen as a dying cultural economy, as well as the film industry, where less money is being put towards the distribution stage of movie releases in cinemas, and more towards the consumption stage on online streaming platforms.

Source: People Sitting Inside the Cinema by Tima Mirochnichenko on Pexels

The Future of Cinemas:

With its existence under threat during the pandemic, cinemas are now coming up with new, creative ways and making improvements to their business models to secure their position as global institutes of culture. Such is the case with the ‘Barbenheimer’ phenomenon that was quoted to have “saved the summer box office” by The Guardian (2023), with its unique marketing strategy by releasing both films on the same day, and encouraging audiences to see both at cinemas for a special summer double-feature. Moreover, since the outbreak, cinemas across the UK, began offering the unique opportunity to experience ‘event cinema’, which includes the screening showings of theatre productions and concerts at a reduced price, including Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour Concert.

All of this is done in an effort to re-establish the need for cinemas as a hub for socialising and culture, where the means of consumption are “not replicable in alternative distribution channels”, as suggested by Weinberg et al. (2020). Though the film industry is constantly evolving, through the digitalisation of content for consumption on streaming platforms, cinema is not a dying art form – it is a transcultural phenomenon, which offers us an escape and one which must be preserved at all costs. 

Please share your thoughts on how much you value the relevance of cinemas and why we should strive to protect this cultural industry down below.

All images and media are used under fair usage for educational purposes.

Leave a comment

Mystery, Escapism, and the Beauty of the Sitcom: Marvel’s Daring Step in a New Direction – Wandavision Review

By 1823805

Back in January, Marvel returned to our screens with a bang after a year long hiatus due to the pandemic. With the Black Widow release date in limbo, and Spider-Man: Far From Home having come out in July 2019, it was safe to say that 2020 had left Marvel fans pretty desperate for a glimpse at the state of the MCU following the chaos that was Endgame.

Image 1: Marvel Studios (2021) Promotional Image, All rights reserved.

Then suddenly: Hope. The Wandavision trailer, alongside plenty more Marvel content, premiered during the 2020 Emmy Awards, with the 80 second preview racking up a record breaking 53 million views in the following 24 hours.

Wandavision Trailer 1, via Marvel Studios on Youtube

Suddenly, Wanda Maximoff and her synthezoid husband Vision were thrust into the spotlight as the face of the upcoming Phase Four of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but that didn’t mean that fans weren’t left with many, many, questions. Even casual fans of Marvel films were by now aware that Vision was brutally destroyed not once, but twice in 2018s Infinity War, so how could he be back in one piece? Why were the pair seemingly caught in an extended I Love Lucy reference? Most importantly, where were the other Avengers? To put it quite simply, fans couldn’t wait to see what mysteries Wandavision contained. And, my god, it definitely did not disappoint.

Releasing weekly over a period of eight weeks, creator and head writer Jac Schaeffer kept viewers on their toes until the final episode. Each week fans flocked to social media to excitedly discuss theories and predictions, making checking your phone a minefield every Friday before getting a chance to catch yourself up to speed. The show was masterfully written, with there being a certain beauty in not truly understanding what was going on inside “The Hex” until the final act. In fact, a major part of the enjoyment of watching each week was seeing who had gotten closest to understanding what was happening to Westview and its inhabitants, and trying to figure out if we were watching the beginnings of Wanda’s villainous origins.

Image 2: Marvel Studios (2021), Wanda Maximoff, All Rights Reserved

Watching the natural chemistry between Avenger’s movie veterans’ Elizabeth Olsen and Paul Bettany was a joy for fans, as was watching them travel through multiple decades using the power of sitcom references. From Bewitched to Modern Family, the show was absolutely a huge gamble for Marvel, as their homage to the sitcom genre represented a break away from the usual blockbuster formula that the MCU had been relying on since 2008. Rather than focusing on high octane battles and massive displays of power, we got to witness the love between Scarlett Witch and Vision that had been somewhat side-lined in their previous big screen appearances. Olsen proved herself to be just as phenomenal on the small screen as she is cinematically, giving the viewer an in depth look into Wanda’s psyche.

Image 3: Marvel Studios (2021), Wanda Breaks Down. All Rights Reserved.

From making us laugh, to making us cry in an instant, Olsen was reported as being outside of her comfort zone for the role, due to the emotional themes represented within the script. With the series grappling with complex emotions such as grief and loss, Wandavision encourages the viewer to connect with their own emotions, whilst presenting a beloved character wrestling with her own.

All in all, Wandavision was absolutely worth the wait. With a stellar supporting cast containing the likes of legends such as Randall Park, Kat Dennings, and the extraordinary Katherine Hahn, the series was a masterpiece. Fans around the world have expressed their excitement for Wanda’s return in Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness, which was first hinted at in the post credits scene of the final episode, and confirmed by the Scarlett Witch herself. What a way to kickstart a new era!

Image 4: Disney+ (2021), The Final Battle, All Rights Reserved.

WandaVision and the Changing Television Landscape (1824311)

The creative industries form an important part of our leisure time, particularly during the pandemic when most people have consumed more content than usual. Especially on streaming services such as Netflix, Amazon and Disney+, which have seen significant increases in viewings. The show I would like to focus on is the new Disney+ hit ‘WandaVision’. ‘WandaVision’ is a 9 part Marvel TV show set in a sitcom style, with classic Marvel big budget features, demonstrating how film is merging into television to explore new creative modes.  

While still reeling from the events of ‘Avengers: Endgame’, fans were thrilled with the ‘what happens next?’ perspective that ‘WandaVision’ presented. Each episode was up to an hour long, and cost around $25million, featuring impressive sets, costumes and special effects. This made me think about the TV industry in general, and how big budget TV is becoming more common, especially among streaming giants

Some examples of this include the ‘Mandalorian’, “Game of Thrones’ and ‘The Crown’. These shows, much like ‘WandaVision’ have huge budgets for each episode and attract significantly large audiences. Yet it must be considered that most of these shows are produced by streaming companies. This could be a demonstration of how the growth in the creative industries is increasingly becoming digital, with streaming companies able to spend money on lavish shows that rival film production costs and lure audiences away from broadcast television. When creating ‘The Falcon and The Winter Soldier’, the director quoted “this cannot be TV, it has to feel like a movie”, demonstrating how the cinematic universe is beginning to merge with the television format. 

Image 2: Vrabelova, J. (2021) Winter Soldier and Falcon. Marvel Studios, all rights reserved.

This signifies a shift in the television industry as broadcasters are trying to compete with major companies to produce quality programming. According to OFCOM (2018), streaming overtook established pay TV for the first time, representing changing audiences habits, with 18-34 year olds increasingly preferring online streaming. 

Could this be why Disney has invested so much attention and money to its new streaming service and production of original content? There are several major shows being prepared for release, helping Disney’s subscription base to grow rapidly, already reaching half the size of Netflix’s despite only being out for a year. 

The choice to do ‘WandaVision’ as a TV show rather than a film, was a decision that both benefited the plotline of the show, and fans’ ability to engage with the content. As opposed to film, this format offered many affordances, such as the time to develop extra meaningful moments that may have been left out of films. As well as using the weekly episode release to create cliff-hangers and motivate fan speculation. This meant instead of being engaged with the product for 2 hours in the cinema, we were engaged for 9 weeks, staying subscribed to Disney+ and watching their other content as well. A clever move on Disney’s part, and potentially a key reason as to why most of their new content is television rather than film.

Image 3: Marvel Studios (2021) Wanda Maximoff. All rights reserved.

 “Hollywood blockbusters like Endgame will always be popular, but we may see a migration of money in Hollywood”

(Katz, 2020, Observer).

Having watched ‘WandaVision’, I would suggest that the use of big budget TV is going to continue to grow. It allows plotlines to be developed further, especially ones that may not have been turned into films, as well as allowing for more creativity to be exercised in the format of the content, while still achieving monetary gains. Whereas previously film was the best way to make large profits for Marvel, TV shows such as ‘WandaVision’ prove that no longer needs to be the case. For big media players, this is a positive change, offering them new avenues to explore and the chance to further boost streaming subscriptions. However, for independent producers and broadcast television, it will be interesting to see how they adapt in the next few years to compete in a changing media landscape

All images used under ‘fair usage’ for educational purposes.

Image 1: Marvel Studios (2021) Wanda and Vision [Image] All rights reserved. Used under fair usage for educational purposes. Available at: https://dmedmedia.disney.com/disney-plus/wandavision/images [Accessed 4th May, 2021]. 

Image 2: Vrabelova, J. (2021) Winter Soldier and Falcon [Image] Marvel Studios, all rights reserved. Used under fair usage for educational purposes. Available at: https://dmedmedia.disney.com/disney-plus/the-falcon-and-the-winter-soldier/images? [Accessed 4th May, 2021] 

Image 3: Marvel Studios (2021) Wanda Maximoff [Image] All rights reserved. Used under fair usage for educational purposes. Available at: https://dmedmedia.disney.com/disney-plus/wandavision/images [Accessed 4th May, 2021]. 

(1830440) Who lives, who dies, who tells your story? Legacy of founding father cemented through Disney Plus performance – Hamilton Review!

Who lives, who dies, who tells your story?

In the case of one of America’s founding fathers Alexander Hamilton, his story and legacy is continued in the Broadway sensation, Hamilton. Lin-Manuel Miranda, known for composing and starring in Tony Winner musical In the heights, shoulders Hamilton’s legacy by telling the re-imagined story of the founding fathers’ life through musical performance. Originally opening in New York’s Public Theater in 2015 to rave reviews, Hamilton went on to win many awards including an Olivier, Tony, and Grammy award.

Hamilton was a huge draw on the Broadway stage, so much so that Disney spent $75million acquiring the film version.

Hamilton | Official Trailer | Disney+ | Walt Disney Studios (YouTube)

The film is a live recording of an original performance, decorated by a multicultural cast led by Miranda, representing a modern America, and the story of the America that Alexander Hamilton helped create:

“It takes on a different meaning when you see black and brown performers telling the origin story of our country,”

– L. M. Miranda

It is a reminder of the contribution immigrants such as Hamilton have made to American history, and a message that the creative economy excels with inclusion and diversity. The cultural message of diversity, and equality, echoes throughout the narrative as the characters speak of civil rights and slavery, resonating with the fates of immigrants in America.

Daveed Diggs as Jefferson and the cast of Hamilton.
© Joan Marcus, Taken from Hamilton – Broadway.

Whilst remaining faithful to historical record, Hamilton parallels the nothing to something narrative typically used in hip-hop, emphasising a diverse remix culture ever more apparent in modern cultural and creative economies. The scores are composed from sampled parts from numerous music genres such as hip-hop, jazz, blues, RnB, rap, and several more. The songs complement and contrast one another, maintaining the theater experience by perpetrating the energy of the stage with a seamless flow between songs.

Due to the constraints of the covid-19 pandemic, the theatrical release of Hamilton targeted for 2021 was brought forwards to July 3rd 2020, to direct-to-stream release on Disney plus.

As a result of this move to a digital platform, Disney plus accumulated over 752451 additional downloads globally allowing both Disney and Broadway to diversify their demographic by targeting new audiences. The commodification of cultural products such as theater may be considered harmful to some, however I argue it is far more beneficial.

Taken from Disney+ website.

In the pre-digital cultural economy, institutions have to raise prices to mitigate effects of rising costs from inflation. According to Statista (2009-2019), Broadway has seen a consistent revenue increase over the past few years, with musicals attributing a majority of revenue. In 2015/2016, the year of Hamilton’s Broadway release, musicals contributed $1173 million to the cultural economy.

Further Statista (2006-2019) statistics suggest that the average ticket price has also seen a consistent increase to the already large price tag, from $105 (15/16) to $122 (18/19), given Hamilton’s success, prices far exceed these, meaning the musical performance has limited accessibility to the public.   

“Alexander Hamilton” Clip | Hamilton | Disney+ | Walt Disney Studios (YouTube)

Digital performances to cinemas or home computers impact the access and participation of audiences in a positive way by providing lower costs. Digitalisation encourages participation with new audiences, a marketing tool for cultural institutions to earn more money, by removing their elitist image.

The cultural economy is high risk, boasting big rewards and high risk of failure. The quality standard is a bar set high, turnover is excessive, and product cycles tend to be short. The digital cultural economy allows more accessibility by indefinitely lengthening the lifespan of cultural products. Therefore, we can establish that the brilliance of Lin Manuel Miranda and Hamilton lives on, and the cultural product is protected from dying as the story is told by many worldwide.

END.

Word Count: 626

Vertical Integration Heats up Streaming Wars as Movies Move Online (C1645829)

The Mandalorian leads Disney’s charge into the Streaming Wars

IMAGE: Disney+

While studios and cinemas are shut, box-office battles are being fought online. This is a very good time to be vertically integrated.

During the Covid-19 crisis, captive audiences worldwide are signing up for Video On Demand (VOD) services and binging the hours away to get through lockdown. The coming months might be the decisive battle of the streaming wars.

While social distancing measures remain in place, cinemas are empty and TV and movie production has effectively ground to a halt.

Rather than lose money waiting for cinemas to reopen, some studios are releasing completed films on home video platforms within the 90-day grace period cinema chains usually demand from distributors, or foregoing cinematic release altogether. 

Cinemas have responded with threats to boycott upcoming blockbusters, but with the public banned from gathering, they aren’t the ones with the power

Empty seats are more of a problem for cinemas than for producers
IMAGE: Tuur Tisseghem via Pexels

By bringing popular franchise entries to their sister streaming services, large studios can lure in subscribers with popular titles and avoid splitting their profits with cinemas. 

This is the strategy behind Disney’s decision to premiere Artemis Fowl on Disney+, while WarnerMedia and NBCUniversal prepare to launch their own services.

With their stranglehold on the box office, Disney can’t be cowed by cinema chains’ sabre-rattling. Pixar’s latest title, Onward appeared on Disney+ partway through its disappointing cinematic run without a peep from exhibitors. 

A poor performance for Pixar
IMAGE: Disney

I must admit a little schadenfreude that after Hollywood sneered for years at Netflix’s attempts to move into production, the company is not only receiving awards for its work with top directors, but creaky old studios are remaking themselves in its vertically-integrated, VOD image. Perhaps the industry will finally stop treating home video as an inferior experience, and let time-poor consumers pay to watch their films in a way that suits them.

The successes of BFIPlayer and MUBI demonstrate that cinephiles do value the ease of access provided by VOD subscription services. These curated services give viewers easy access to hard-to-find movies, without the need to wait for a local screening or drop serious money on a DVD or Blu-Ray release. Even Studio Ghibli has finally been dragged kicking and screaming into the mid-2000s and made its library available to rent or buy digitally.

Spirited Away is just one of the Studio Ghibli classics now available digitally
IMAGE: Studio Ghibli

What about serialised content?

Fledgeling services might falter now that they can’t produce original series to attract subscribers, so a strong back catalogue is more important than ever. Disney+’s extensive film and television library justifies the price of entry for families, but Apple TV+’s originals only model means they might struggle to hold onto subscribers when the trickle of new content dries up, while their competitors keep securing fan favourites to lure in audiences.

Consumers are seeking out comfort and familiarity
IMAGE: Vlada Karpovich via Pexels

Though Netflix is still the king of streaming, there are more competitors than ever to erode their subscriber base. Shortly after losing the Star Wars and Marvel franchises to Disney’s own subscription service, WarnerMedia and NBCUniversal are both taking back their own crown jewels to make a play for the VOD market. By waiting out or buying out of exclusive licensing deals for Friends and The Office US respectively, these studios hope subscribers will follow their comfort-watching favourites to their new platforms HBOMax and Peacock. As Covid-19 eats into household incomes, cash-strapped customers might be forced to choose the platform that best meets their needs and for a lot of people that just isn’t Netflix anymore.