Full circle: A24, Blockbusters, and Streaming. (C2066542) (Re-uploaded media as approved by CW)

Photo by Paul Deetman on Pexels.com

Digital disruption.

Everything everywhere all at once. The name for A24’s most financially successful film to date can almost serve as a somewhat ironic metaphor for the pivotal effect the rise of streaming services reckoned on the film industry throughout the 2010s. Whilst the sector had faced disruptive technologies before, nothing quite shook up the established business model of the industry than the mass abundance and anytime, anywhere nature that streaming afforded to viewers. Not only were IT-backed streaming services gaining vast piles of data to algorithmically provide viewers with tailor-made content, but they were also ushering in a golden age of television, moving writers from top movies towards the financial abundance of Silicon Valley. What resulted was what your local Reddit page may scoff at today: the mass influx of sequels, remakes, and franchises. In a time where competition is high, and uncertainty is abundant, Hollywood’s risk-averse nature showed, and the big-budget blockbusters of the franchise era replaced mid and low-budget films. One thing was clear: the film industry was struggling, and corporate imperatives were starting to clash with artistic vision. Nevertheless, while the tentpoles and high-concept movies were having their heyday, one New York-based distribution company saw a gap.

A24: Critical acclaim, marketing astuteness, and strategic partnerships.

Spring-breakers trailer (2012). A24.

Spurred on by the abundance of similarity within the industry at the time, alongside several major ‘Indiewood’ studios closing between 2008 and 2010 , three industry veterans created the independent film distributing company A24. Unlike previous generations of independent distributors, A24’s strategy to capitalize on the hit-and-miss nature of independent cinema was to diversify the risk by investing in shrewd viral marketing strategies. An example can be found in their 2012 hit Spring-Breakers, where their now trademark neon colour pallet met iconic imagery and quirky soundbites that struck a chord with young audiences on up-and-coming social media networks. Their gamble paid off, and whilst major studios spent huge sums on trailers and billboards, Spring-breakers (2012) flew to no.1 at the box office . Alongside their marketing wisdom, A24 quickly discovered that streaming was the future. In 2013, a year after its establishment, A24 struck deals with DirecTV and Amazon TV in return for exclusive video-on-demand and streaming rights . The result of such ventures was multi-layered; not only did A24 have a new stream of ancillary revenue flooding in, but it also had both access to mass streams of data analytics to refine their practices, and a new port of entry to their majorly online young audiences. Backed by Silicon Valley, A24 went on to distribute several successes in the periods between 2013- 2016, including Ex Machina (2015), Room (2015), and The Witch (2016). However, as A24’s popularity as a brand grew, so did its ambitions, and the next port of call was production.

Expansion: Production, Zeitgeists, and Voice.

Moonlight trailer (2016). A24.

Moonlight (2016)- a tale of a young black man’s journey to manhood- was the company’s first production. Writer/ Director Barry Jenkins told The Guardian he went with A24 because it “was the one place that was like: ‘make this film your way.’”. The investment proved a financial and critical success, winning the Oscar for best picture alongside making over $60m off a $4m budget. Fast forward to 2024, and A24 has given directorial debuts to Greta Gerwig, Jonah Hill, and Bo Burnham, alongside producing hits like Uncut Gems (2019), Everything Everywhere All at Once (2022), and Aftersun (2022). Most impressive, however, is the cult-like status the company has amassed with fans, becoming synonymous with notions of ‘indie cool’. Notable is their website, which hosts exclusive merchandise, podcasts, and a membership program. The company also transitioned into television, benefiting from the post-pandemic streaming boom with productions like Euphoria (2019) and Beef (2023). However, A24’s success seems to lie more  in artistic expression than corporate strategy. As filmmaker Lulu Wang told The Guardian, “A24’s brand is intertwined with the identities it works with, it’s known for championing unique voices”. Fans don’t disagree, with one fan telling Vulture, “A24 stands out because it’s new; the intensity of its movies brings out emotions in ways films never had before.”. In an era dominated by remakes and franchises, supporting a brand like A24 feels like supporting risk-taking, creativity, and filmmakers with a distinct point of view.

Uncertainty.

Photo by Genie Music on Pexels.com

Due to their winning formula of corporate strategy mixed with creative freedom, A24 attracted $225m worth of investment in 2022, making the company now valued at $2.5 billion. Alongside their increased worth, A24 has plans to expand, with their biggest project to date, Alex Garlands Civil War, set to release in 2024. From mining existing franchises, such as a prequel to the Friday the 13th series, or talks of an upcoming Elon Musk biopic, A24 shows little sign of slowing down . Although, as A24’s head of film told Bloomberg, they are “excited by the idea of changing the mainstream,” it brings up feelings of uncertainty towards the company’s future. To expand, it seems they may have to move towards the IP-driven franchise films it sought to escape in 2012 while risking losing its cinephile audiences . The expansion also comes at a time of deep uncertainty in Hollywood as record-breaking strikes and fears of AI loom over the industry’s already falling box office post-COVID-19 . Whether they succeed in – or fundamentally change- the mainstream remains unclear. What seems evident, however, is that the success of A24 at least provides a template for how artistic freedom can collaborate with financial success in an era of risk-averse franchises.

How Digitalising the Film Industry will stop the Corruption of Innovation and the Reliance on the Blockbuster Formula (C1943857)

Sourced from Flickr, from Biblioteca de Arte. 

The modern film industry is now bringing in more money than in any other era and has produced some of the most successful films at the box office. So why is there less originality in our modern blockbusters? The most notable films are currently part of a franchise or remakes/sequels of known properties. This has led to problems such as:  

  • The corporate takeover of the creative industries  

  • The decline of true freedom of expression in the modern age  

  • Audiences are getting used to the formula and do not want deviation 

  • The future decline of the industry  

I will be looking at these problems, why they are present and how they can be solved. 

Looking first at the modern film landscape and the highest-grossing films of the last decade, we can see that only one of the top thirty-five films is not a remake, sequel, or part of a larger franchise, this being 2013’s Frozen. If we then compare to the 70s and 80s, there is only one franchise film in the 70s out of the top ten and six original films in the top ten in the 80s. Why is this?   

Disney is the main culprit of controlling franchise films and billing the top of the box office. Owning both the Marvel film rights and Star Wars, Disney can consistently bring out the highest-grossing movies, and no other company can touch them. These films are usually very crowd-pleasing and are made to draw in the largest audiences with inoffensive subject matters and a formulaic story structure. This has been the standard for far too long, and many people only go to the cinema to watch franchise films instead of something new. This is a problem for the future of the industry.   

This is not to say creativity does not exist in the modern film industry, but if the highest-grossing films from the last decade are not flexing innovative ideas, then what are the problems? The modern film industry can breed more creativity and fresh ideas in different avenues. A24 is an independent film production and distribution company that produces new independent cinemas and distributes them to cinemas and streaming services. However, the most popular of these, 2018’s Hereditary, took at the box office less than a ninth of the 35th top-grossing film of the last decade. So why are people choosing to watch something they are familiar with instead of something they have never seen before? 

The comfort of consuming the more oversized franchise products makes it easy to create a franchise film in the modern age and market it to a modern audience. This is because franchises such as Marvel and Star Wars are available on the most popular streaming services and there are usually one of these films in the cinema at a time as three Marvel films come out each year. This means a regular consumer of blockbusters who usually only goes to the cinema to see franchise films are now even less likely to watch an original film. Because the formula has been proven to create a big blockbuster and make a guaranteed hit, it is both safer for the company and more comfortable/convenient for consumers. 

Martin Scorsese once described Marvel movies as theme parks and how they are “not real cinema”. This caused much discourse online about if he was right, and many took Disney’s side in the debate. This is expected from modern consumers who mostly only watch films like this and do not branch out and watch something new.  

But maybe there is a light at the end of this tunnel. Streaming services are usually seen as killing the film industry by taking away audiences from the cinema and letting people passively watch shows and films at home. Nevertheless, this does not consider all the boundary-pushing contemporary films on streaming services. Old and new directors can have complete control of their films because they are on a lower budget on a streaming service. Films like: 

  • The Irishman 

  • I’m Thinking of Ending Things 

  • Uncut Gems 

  • Marriage Story 

  • Power of the Dog 

These are all examples just from Netflix that are original films, from respected directors such as Charlie Kaufman and were critically and commercially successful. Though they did not make as much money as the franchise films as they were released online, the digitalisation of the film industry allowed these to flourish in this new medium. 

Sourced from Flickr, by Mehmet Can  

I believe the digitalisation of the film industry and the popularity of streaming services will improve the types of films being made. To stand out on these streaming services, creators must continually make films that present something new from the competition and create original, boundary-pushing content. Though most people believe the digital age has hurt the film industry, creativity is still thriving but in a new type of distribution. Streaming is the new breeding ground for innovation and creativity, further digitalising the film industry. I believe this will solve the problems of a future crash in Hollywood caused by formulated productions. 

All images sourced from Flickr.

Images and multimedia used in accordance with fair use for educational purposes.